Discrimination Attorneys

Federal officials filed suit yesterday against the Lefrak City, the largest apartment complex in Queens, management, women discriminated against them by refusing to provide jobs for their maintenance.

In the trial, in Federal District Court in Brooklyn, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, said that at least four women have been deprived, sustainable jobs in the development of large housing since 1994 and the two others were set on fire of temporary job because of their gender.

The names of two appeals Lefrak affiliates of the organization, Mid-State management and resolution Felgreen Corporation, and seeks to new regime and countervailing measures and punitive damages, for the six women.

Agency officials said they were always looking for women who have applied for maintenance work at Lefrak City in the last five years.

”Women can do this kind of job,’’said H. Spencer Lewis, Jr., Director of the Commission, the New York office. ”We know they can, and they have proven they can. They can compete with men on an equal basis.”

Fredric S. Newman, a lawyer representing the company in the complaint, said that the charges were without merit.

”The companies are proud of their workforce, which is highly diversified,”he said. ”We tolerate any discrimination in hiring or other.”

Mr. Newman said he had no information on the composition of the team, but also those who said in the defence, there are four women among the 200 full-time groundskeepers, banks and institutions DEPOSIT Lefrak City.

”That should tell you that something should go wrong,’’said Jennifer Sands, 34, was the first woman on the staff has been placed as a temporary, one in 1995. She said that three months after a complaint to the Commission during the year 1997, it was an ongoing task.

Another claimant, Rhonda Alston, said that his supervisor, subtle forms of harassment, having complained to the Commission. ”You know, I have children, but he gave me the night relocate, which means that I work to take care of myself and consist of four 18-storey buildings,’’said Mrs. Alston, 42”Even a man can not alone.”

Beginning in 1992, the two women each year for maintenance, and the positions each time, they were told, there was no opening.

”I felt, but I would be each year, new men,’’said Ms. Alston, which, as Ms. Sands said, lived largely on the complexity of their lives. Finally, he né”moi, she feels discriminated against as we are.”

Women, says one, $ 14 an hour for maintenance work Lefrak City were particularly prized because of the health benefits. ”Here, people keep very prestigeträchtig, madame’’said Alston.

, More than 40 hectares in Elmhurst, Corona and Rego Park, Lefrak City helped foothills of the development of means of Queens, where in the year 1960, it was built.

After White and the Jews, the complex of 20 buildings has been rapid demographic change in the mid-1970 that a federal discrimination case for the accused Lefrak organization of the race and prejudice caused the business to one month’s rent 50 free black families.

LEAD: with a law, the Federal Office of Housing to protect people with disabilities from discrimination, officials from the Department of Justice and medication therapy programs trying to the community through the opposition group to rehabilitate alcoholics and drug addicts.

With a law, the Federal Office of Housing to protect people with disabilities from discrimination, officials from the Department of Justice and medication therapy programs trying to the community through the opposition group to rehabilitate alcoholics and addicts.

During the past year, lawyers for the section, the Fair Housing Act of 1988 which renters, who refused to rent to be recovered addicts. In the same way, federal officials and representatives of lawyers Oxford House Inc., a group that operates alcohol and drugs in houses from 24 countries who have the right to bring to justice against those municipalities that have tried use zoning laws, regulations and are blocking the construction of such houses.

Group for the restoration of housing and drug addicts, alcoholics are apartments or houses where independent adults share living quarters, or under the supervision of an adviser, or on their own. The group tries to support emotional for each member of the way he tries to refrain from alcohol or drug consumption.

Suit in Fairfax County

A jury in the first trial of this process began Monday in Federal District Court in Virginia. In this case, the Department of Justice responsible for managing Southern Corporation, which operates 50 apartment complexes in Maryland and Virginia, with the illegal discharge of leasing at the crossroads of three housing program rehabilitative medicine, Fairfax County. The case has attracted the attention of the people in rehabilitating others, who say that the opposition neighbourhood is a major obstacle for the development of therapy programs places.

THE Internet is, in many ways and by design, a lawless place.

If this newspaper were to publish a classified advertisement for an apartment rental that said, say, ”African Americans and Arabians tend to clash with me so that won’t work out,” it would be liable for housing discrimination under the federal Fair Housing Act.

Yet Craigslist.org, the enormous online forum, posted that very ad in July, and most legal experts say, as the law stands today, Craigslist bears no responsibility for it.

That is the result of a social bargain made 10 years ago, meant to nurture what was then a strange and nascent thing called the Internet. A part of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 said that online companies are not liable for transmitting unlawful materials supplied by others.

Now that the Internet is more mature, some legal experts say, it may be time to re-examine that bargain, and to ask some fundamental questions. Are online companies common carriers, like the phone company or FedEx, and so not responsible for the content of what they transmit? Or are they like newspapers and magazines, which are held accountable for publishing advertising they had no part in creating?

Does it make sense to allow lawsuits against this newspaper for the letters to the editor in this section but not for postings from readers on the paper’s Web site?

A lawsuit against Craigslist filed by a Chicago fair-housing group last month, over the ”clash with me” ad and more than 100 others, asks those questions.

Court decisions so far have almost universally rejected claims against online companies that publish others’ speech. Internet companies have been held immune from suits for libel, invasion of privacy, fraud, breach of contract and housing discrimination.

That means Amazon cannot be sued for its users’ millions of reviews of the books and other products it sells. America Online is not responsible for the six million new entries posted on its message boards each month. EBay is not liable for damaging statements among the more than 2.4 billion feedback comments its members have posted. And search engines like Google, MSN and Yahoo do not have to worry about the billions of Web pages they make available to their users.

More : query.nytimes.com

There are five Civil Court judgeships at stake in New York City’s Democratic primaries next Tuesday. The winners are almost certain to prevail in the general election. Here are our choices.

BROOKLYN. The countywide race matches Loren Baily, a sole practitioner specializing in Federal employment and housing discrimination litigation, and the incumbent judge, Bernard Fuchs, who is seeking a third 10-year term. Ms. Baily may have promise for the future. But Judge Fuchs has done a sufficiently good job to warrant re-election.

MANHATTAN. First Municipal Court District (Greenwich Village, Tribeca, SoHo, Lower Manhattan and portions of the Lower East Side): This race boasts two able candidates with strong commitments to public service — Elizabeth Shollenberger, an independent-minded Legal Services attorney long active in local politics, and Paul Feinman, president of the Lesbian and Gay Law Association of Greater New York and a clerk to a state appellate judge. Ms. Shollenberger has broader experience. But we are impressed by Mr. Feinman’s even temperament and the high regard for him within the court system. We endorse Mr. Feinman.

Fourth Municipal District (14th Street to 59th Street east of Lexington Avenue): The incumbent Civil Court Judge, Jay Stuart Dankberg, is a knowledgeable jurist. He also engages in wisecracking and other inappropriate courtroom behavior that has earned him a ”not approved” rating from the City Bar Association — a rare vote of no confidence for a sitting judge. We endorse his opponent, Eileen Rakower, a law secretary to an acting State Supreme Court justice, with a judicious approach and a good grasp of the court system.

Seventh Municipal District (north of 110th Street west of Fifth Avenue): Throughout her career, spent mostly as an attorney with Bronx Legal Services, Lucy Billings has demonstrated a laudable commitment to protecting the legal rights of the indigent. Another candidate, Milton Tingling, a Civil Court law clerk with experience in private practice, has a calm personality that seems well suited for the gritty, fast-paced work of the lower court. Either would be preferable to a third contender, Harry Pollak, a lawyer in private practice. In a close call, we endorse Mr. Tingling.

More : query.nytimes.com

Charles H. Tenney, a senior judge in the Federal District Court in Manhattan and a former deputy mayor under Robert F. Wagner, died yesterday at his home in Islip, L.I. Mr. Tenney, who also had an apartment on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, was 83.

The cause was cancer, said Marguerite T. Embry, his daughter.

For a decade and a half, until his death, he was a senior judge of his court, to which he was first named in 1964.

Judge Tenney was a close friend of Mayor Wagner, who held office from 1954 to 1965. They were classmates at Yale College and roommates at Yale Law School. In 1955, he joined the Wagner administration as Commissioner of Investigation. He went on to be Corporation Counsel — the city’s chief lawyer — and then City Administrator before taking the job of Deputy Mayor-City Administrator until he became a judge.

In his years on the bench, Judge Tenney presided over several highly publicized cases involving the issue of racial discrimination. In 1991, he signed a settlement ending a housing discrimination suit that was part of a feud involving different groups of Brooklyn residents. In the settlement, the New York City Housing Authority agreed to accept only black or Hispanic applicants for vacancies over several years in three housing projects, all in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn, where 68 percent of the residents were Hasidic Jews.

In 1980, the judge issued an injunction barring a Brooklyn housing development, Bedford Gardens, from using a racial quota to favor Hasidic Jews over blacks and Puerto Ricans in the renting of apartments.

More : query.nytimes.com

This city has two images of Damian Williams, the man on trial in the beating of a white truck driver in last year’s riot, and these images sometimes seem to have very little to do with each other.

To horrified television viewers, Mr. Williams is a symbol of the unpredictable violence that menaces this city, the man prosecutors say was captured on videotape throwing a brick at the head of the driver, Reginald O. Denny, and then dancing a victory jig. But for some black residents, the 20-year-old defendant also represents something else: society’s unequal treatment of blacks and whites.

A jury is now deliberating whether Mr. Williams, along with Henry Watson, 29, is guilty of a dozen offenses, including attempted murder, in the televised beating of Mr. Denny and seven other motorists at the start of the rioting on April 29, 1992. Mr. Williams’s lawyer, Edi M. O. Faal, has argued that his client was not the man on the videotape, and that even if he is, his offenses were relatively minor.

“By all the stereotypes inbred into our culture, Williams, with his scowling appearance, looks like the guy Spike Lee has made millions of dollars warning us about,” wrote Charles L. Lindner, a lawyer who is white, in an article on the op-ed page in The Los Angeles Times.

Even many white liberals who are sympathetic to the grievances of black residents here share this first perception, finding the moment of violence and jubilation Mr. Williams is accused of to be beyond excusing.

“If people are going to hold up Damian Williams as an example of what’s wrong with the criminal justice system, they are not going to get much sympathy at all,” said Mark Weintraub, an optometrist, who is white.

Yet even many middle-class blacks who may seem to have more in common with people like Dr. Weintraub than with people like Mr. Williams voice concern about the defendant’s treatment and his fate.

They emphasize that they do not support or condone the violent actions he is accused of. But for them he is a symbol of what many say they have experienced in the justice system and in many other areas of life — from frequent traffic stops and rough handling by the police to job and housing discrimination.

“Emotionally we are tugged,” said Harold C. Hart-Nibbrig, a black lawyer who grew up only a few streets from the intersection where Mr. Denny was attacked. “I never would have thrown that brick. Most of the people who are screaming for amnesty would not have thrown that brick.”

But, he added: “When I’m out of my community I feel I am treated with suspicion. When I am in my community I feel there is no distinction being made by the police between me and the perpetrators of crime. That’s a commonality between me and Damian Williams.”

But Mr. Hart-Nibbrig’s 81-year-old mother, Annabelle, a former dancer, takes a harder line. The man she sees on the video, she says, is “a beast attacking a human being” and “deserves punishment regardless of his race.”

More : query.nytimes.com

Your Feb. 17 editorial on black-white income inequality repeats the claim that ‘’such inequality is more a problem of poor education, weak skills and the rise in single-parent families than of race.” In fact, continuing racial discrimination plays an important role in perpetuating this inequality.

The evidence for continuing housing discrimination is strong. A 1989 national study found that blacks were shown about 25 percent fewer housing units than were equally qualified whites, and over the last four years similar studies have found no sign of a downward trend.

Discrimination in housing restricts the access of blacks to good school districts and therefore contributes to the black-white skill differential. Housing discrimination also limits the access of blacks to neighborhoods near jobs and helps confine many black households to high-poverty neighborhoods.

Studies of hiring practices have documented continuing hiring discrimination against young black men. Racial discrimination still has a lot to do with the black-white income gap, and anti-discrimination policy has a key role to play in bringing incomes closer together.

More : query.nytimes.com

Heartened by a judge’s decision in Colorado yesterday striking down that state’s initiative opposing gay rights, advocates of gay rights say they are encouraged about their chances of keeping similar measures off the ballot in other states.

“The decision affirms clearly that the fundamental rights of lesbians and gay man cannot be voted away by the general public,” said Suzanne Goldberg, a New York lawyer for the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, a gay rights group. “With courts in California, Oregon and Colorado declaring anti-gay initiatives unconstitutional, it’s a big boost for us.”

Since last year, when Colorado voters passed Amendment 2, banning laws intended to protect homosexuals from job and housing discrimination, conservative groups across the country have started petition drives for similar laws.

In November, voters in Cincinnati, Portsmouth, N.H., and Lewiston, Me., passed measures limiting gay rights. And conservative and religious groups in Florida, Idaho, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, Oregon, Texas and Washington are organizing efforts for such legislation in their states. Defining the Debate

The initiatives have provoked an impassioned debate over whether homosexuals make up a group that has been discriminated against and needs civil rights protection, as their advocates maintain, or whether they are seeking special rights and affirmation of sexual behavior that many Americans condemn, as conservatives claim.

Whatever the social debate, the laws rest on shaky legal ground. In Colorado, Judge Jeffrey Bayless of the State District Court quickly issued a temporary injunction after the initiative was passed, the Colorado Supreme Court upheld that injunction, and yesterday Judge Bayless struck down the initiative as unconstitutional.

The Cincinnati initiative, too, has been temporarily enjoined. And in Oregon, after the voters defeated a statewide ballot measure defining homosexuality as “abnormal” and “unnatural,” the Legislature passed a law prohibiting discrimination against homosexuals. But several Oregon towns adopted initiatives opposing gay rights anyway. There are now dozens of pending lawsuits and a new effort for a statewide anti-gay-rights initiative on next year’s ballot.

So far, every court that has considered the initiatives has ruled that they violate the guarantee of equal protection and interfere with the rights of lesbians and gay men to petition the government. “All that is lacking is a sack of stones for throwing,” said one California court in rejecting such an initiative in Riverside, Calif.

Advocates of gay rights are using those decisions to try to persuade judges to block the initiatives before they are passed. Last week a dozen groups petitioned the Florida Supreme Court to keep the proposed amendment there off the ballot. Their brief argues that the initiative would so infringe on the constitutional rights of homosexuals that it should not be put to a vote.

Ms. Goldberg, who filed the brief, said that even if the initiatives never became law, they could do irreparable harm when the campaigns become “a hate debate on whether lesbians and gay men should be permitted our rightful place in society.”

Most of the initiatives ban state or local governments from adopting laws protecting lesbians and gay men from discrimination. Conservatives say such measures are needed to stop homosexuals from winning special rights.

Source : query.nytimes.com

For President Clinton, the event offered an apparently seamless blend of symbolism and substance today, just the right formula to commemorate the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s life.

At a retirement home here, the President helped knock down a wall to make room for a health clinic. Then he announced what he called ”the largest settlement in history” of a case involving lending discrimination in housing: $6.5 billion.

But while the wall fell without much fuss, the mortgage company accused of discrimination fought back furiously, declaring that it had admitted no wrongdoing and that in the settlement it had committed no more money than it would have otherwise to help minority and low- to moderate-income borrowers.

Still dressed in his blue jeans and invigorated by his volunteer work, Mr. Clinton noted at the Regency House retirement home that Congress passed the Fair Housing Act, outlawing housing discrimination, just six days after Dr. King was killed in 1968.

”He had worked for years to outlaw discrimination in housing,” Mr. Clinton said. ”And many who voted for the measure said they did it in tribute to him.”

The President said that under the agreement, ”the Columbia National Mortgage Company will offer — listen to this — $6.5 billion in home mortgages and extra effort to help 78,000 minority and low- and moderate-income families unlock the door to homeownership.”

But David Gallitano, the chairman and chief executive of Columbia National, said he was shocked by any suggestion that his company had discriminated and was taking dramatic steps to reform its ways.

”I’m sure he was very poorly informed,” Mr. Gallitano said.

The agreement was reached between the company, based in Columbia, Md., and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Housing Department officials said the company signed the agreement in November, and the department signed it on Friday. But it was not disclosed until today.

”All we did with HUD’s concurrence was to take what we had done over the last five years and reaffirm that it was what we would do over the next five years,” Mr. Gallitano said in a telephone interview.

But a Housing Department official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that Columbia had committed to new spending.

”To make the point even clearer, in 1997, Columbia nationally made $1.4 billion in loans” to all borrowers, the official said. ”It is committing almost the same amount over five years for low- and moderate-income loans and other related benefits alone.”

But Mr. Gallitano said the agreement specified only that Columbia must make such money available to qualified minority and low-income buyers, a step, he said, that regulations already demand.

Under the direction of Secretary Andrew Cuomo, HUD over the last two years has stepped up enforcement of the anti-discrimination law. As a result, Mr. Cuomo said, more people are becoming aware of the law, and complaints are rising. But companies, he said, are also taking more steps to comply.

More : query.nytimes.com

Ever the nervous student, Robert Abrams scanned a yellow legal pad moments before addressing a group of about 30 Democratic Party faithful on a recent afternoon. Scribbled at the top, a timeless reminder: “Say nice things about the party.”

Great idea.

He did. Everyone clapped. On to the next stop.

Sometimes using charts and graphs, the New York State Attorney General stands before the cameras, his smudged glasses shining, his hands waving and his Bronx-tinged voice spinning tales of woe about Senator Alfonse M. D’Amato’s voting record, the state’s poor economy and the many scandals that have swirled in the Senator’s wake. Stop after stop, the words repeat in an endless loop, tailored to fit the venue, the audience and the mood. The Standard Fare

For weeks, his standard fare has droned on without providing him with an increase in the polls. Day after day, racing from one unlikely locale to another, Mr. Abrams pounds away, telling older people that their needs should be met, Jews that Israel is important, blacks that civil rights matter and hospital administrators that health care in New York is in a state of crisis. His messages are well framed and well meant. Hitting His Stride

He repeatedly attacks Mr. D’Amato’s involvement in everything from lost Housing and Urban Development grants to lost jobs, the high cost of health insurance and threats to abortion rights. But as he moves toward the final stretch, he may have begun to hit his stride. Sunday, standing first before Local 3 of the Jewish Electrical Welfare Club in Flushing, Queens, and later before about 1,000 congregants at the First Baptist Church in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, Mr. Abrams suddenly hit a groove, winning passionate applause from audiences hungry for change in Washington and better prospects for their future.

At the Baptist church, he spoke of his fight against housing discrimination and his deeply held belief in civil rights. He condemned Mr. D’Amato for casting “the decisive vote” against the 1992 civil rights act and almost brought the congregation to its feet when he promised to “pay Al D’Amato back Nov. 3.”

Even when he ran through his customary litany of the 500,000 jobs lost in New York State, the $117 billion sent to Washington never to return, and his complaint that New Yorkers have suffered from deep cuts in education, health care and other essentials, he seemed almost spontaneous.

“We’ve got news for this administration,” he said, his voice rolling over a carpet of bowed and nodding heads. “They have turned their backs on us over these last 12 years and we are going to turn our backs on them this Nov. 3.”

In closing, he leaned on his only laugh line. “Al D’Amato says he’s bringing home the bacon,” he said in a voice that tends to rise and fall like the tides. “But we know that’s a lot of ba -low- ney! New York is hurting! New York is in pain ! New York has lost more jobs than any state in the nation under the Bush-Quayle-D’Amato years.”

More : query.nytimes.com

In a widely anticipated legal showdown tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a gay rights case that tests the high court’s commitment to insuring fair access to the political process for all Americans.

At issue is the constitutionality of an amendment to the Colorado Constitution that repealed ordinances in three cities protecting homosexuals against discrimination, and barred the state and every local jurisdiction in Colorado from adopting or enforcing any such provisions in the future.

This punitive measure, similar to anti-gay ballot initiatives pressed by the Christian right in other states, was approved by Colorado voters in 1992, after a clever if mean-spirited campaign by proponents that depicted basic anti-bias protections in housing and employment as unjustified “special rights.”

Colorado can be expected to echo arguments in the state’s brief that seek to obscure the bigotry that lies behind the amendment. It will try to establish that the amendment has a legitimate governmental purpose in protecting morality, in putting a divisive public issue to rest and in conserving resources that might otherwise be spent defending homosexuals in order to enforce other civil rights laws.

But there is no masking the anti-gay fervor behind the measure, or the offense to the constitutional principle of equal protection when a defined group of citizens — in this case homosexuals — is denied the right to participate equally and fully in the political process. While all other Coloradans are free to seek redress in state and local legislatures, homosexuals in search of their rights must now scale a uniquely high barrier — persuading Colorado voters to re-amend their state Constitution.

For this reason, the Colorado Supreme Court declared the amendment unconstitutional in 1994 — hence the state’s appeal. The court made clear that the real issue here is not “special rights” for homosexuals, but whether a government may consign a particular group to a lesser category of citizenship. The Clinton Justice Department, retreating from principle, declined to join the legal battle to overturn the Colorado amendment. But the disfranchisement of Colorado’s homosexuals should be clear to the U.S. Supreme Court with or without the Justice Department’s intervention.

The Court has been sensitive to the same sort of equal-protection trespass in previous cases involving race and electoral issues. A 1969 decision, for example, struck down a city charter amendment in Akron, Ohio, that repealed existing anti-discrimination laws and required future voter approval for any local law dealing with housing discrimination.

It is not necessary for the Justices to sympathize with the laws forbidding discrimination against homosexuals, or to find that they as a group have a protected constitutional status. The Court need simply decide that homosexuals deserve the same opportunity to participate in the political process as everyone else.

More : query.nytimes.com

A Federal jury this week directed the owner of a suburban Virginia housing development to pay $850,000 to a group of plaintiffs for having used only white people as models in the development’s advertising.

Legal experts said the verdict, returned Thursday, might be the largest award ever made by a jury in a housing discrimination case. Although the law at issue, the Federal Fair Housing Act, was enacted in 1968, it was not until two years ago that Congress removed the legislation’s $1,000 ceiling on jury awards.

The defendant was Colonial Village, owner of a 640-unit condominium development in Arlington, Va. The plaintiffs argued that Colonial Village’s use of exclusively white models over a five-year period, from 1981 to 1986, had sent a message that blacks were not welcome there.

The suit was brought by two fair-housing groups — the Fair Housing Council of Greater Washington and the Metropolitan Washington Planning and Housing Association — and was joined by Girardeau A. Spann, a black professor of law at Georgetown University. The plaintiffs contended that they were entitled to damages because Colonial Village’s advertising had frustrated their ability to carry out their mission: to assure fair housing.

More : query.nytimes.com

Following are excerpts from an address by President Bush in Springfield, Mo.: Civil Rights

Let me begin with an issue of concern to every American, every fair-minded American, civil rights. Governor Clinton says, and I quote, “Everybody knows I have the best civil rights record” — his words. His modesty overwhelms me. But how does his record stand?

Some of you may know that in 1968 when I was a Congressman from Texas I supported the Fair Housing Act, and it wasn’t popular with some of my constituents. And times have changed, of course. And nowadays 41 states have laws banning housing discrimination — 41. But Arkansas is not one of them, and even though my opponent has been Governor for 12 years. Forty-six states have human relations agencies that safeguard citizens against discrimination. But not Arkansas under his leadership. Forty-eight states have basic civil rights laws that ban discrimination and guarantee equal opportunity, but not Arkansas. And that’s right. Arkansas is only one of two states in America without a civil rights statute.

Candidate Clinton likes to talk about my 1990 veto of the Democratic Congress’s quota bill. And I did veto that bill, and I’ll veto any other quota bill that the liberals cook up.

I am for civil rights, and I am against quotas. And that is not a contradiction.

And so last year, after tough negotiations with Congress and beating back two attempts to ram down my throat and the people’s throat a quota bill, I did sign, proudly sign, a major civil rights bill without resorting to quotas.

And in addition, I fought for the Americans With Disabilities Act, the most sweeping civil rights legislation in 30 years that brings those with disabilities into the mainstream and gives them a shot at the American dream.

And I’m proud of it.

And what about Governor Clinton? Even though his party enjoys overwhelming control of the Arkansas Legislature, Governor Clinton has still not brought a civil rights bill to the people of Arkansas.

And so when you hear the Candidate Clinton’s rhetoric all across this country about civil rights, Governor Clinton’s record just does not stand up. Taxes

Now, consider another issue — economic fairness. You know, Candidate Clinton is playing the old games that liberals love to play, class warfare, divide Americans rich from poor, one group from another. He’s good at it. Candidate Clinton is very good at that, using the same tired, twisted partisan statistics to explain how the poor can only get richer if the rich get poorer.

According to Candidate Clinton, the last 10 years have been a nightmare. Well, I’ve got news for him: it is not true. The Urban Institute back in Washington is not usually sympathetic to me. But listen to what they had to say about the 1980’s. “When one follows individuals, rather than statistical groups defined by income, one finds that on average, the rich got a little richer, and the poor got much richer.” Now that’s the truth. Our policies of cutting taxes have spurred growth for all Americans.

Yes, we’ve got tough times now, but it’s fair to look at the whole record. And Candidate Clinton doesn’t think this is a fair result. He doesn’t think it’s fair, and it’s maybe because Governor Clinton doesn’t have much experience with tax fairness in his own state.

Governor Clinton has more than doubled — you want a horror story, listen to this — he has more than doubled Arkansas state spending since 1983, and he has paid for it by raising the taxes that hurt poor and working families the most. My opponent has raised and extended his sales tax repeatedly, and he has opposed removing that tax from groceries.

More : query.nytimes.co

While voters in other cities have loudly debated and sometimes rejected civil rights protection for homosexuals, St. Louis has quietly adopted one of the strongest gay-rights laws in the nation.

The ordinance, passed unanimously by the city’s aldermen, drew so little attention that its adoption went unreported for two months until The Lesbian and Gay News-Telegraph, a paper based in St. Louis, carried an article about it on Dec. 3.

“One doesn’t think of St. Louis as being in the progressive rank of cities,” said Jim Thomas, editor of The News-Telegraph, which is distributed in five states. But he said of the law’s passage: “We didn’t even have to fight, or even work much.”

The law bars discrimination in housing, credit, employment, education and public access on the grounds of physical or mental disability, race, religion, family status or sexual orientation. ‘Strongest Laws’

“It clearly is one of the strongest laws of the 130 we have in the U.S.,” said Robert Bray, a spokesman for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force in Washington.

Laws in many other cities and states are less comprehensive, he said. Some protect homosexuals from housing discrimination, for example, but not job discrimination.

The St. Louis board included a clause in its law to prevent it from being repealed by referendum, said James Wilson, the city’s lawyer.

Mary Ross, the alderwoman who introduced the measure, said she was not trying to be a trailblazer; she simply wanted to update the city’s civil rights protections.

“I think we covered, hopefully, everybody in this legislation who could possibly be discriminated against in one manner or another, and that is the intent,” she said. “It is not a gay-rights thing.”

The law also created a civil rights commission, which has the power to investigate, fine violators up to $500 and jail them for up to 90 days.

Elsewhere, 1992 was a seesaw year for gay rights laws, with opponents nationwide complaining that such laws created special rights for homosexuals.

Voters in Colorado approved a measure that repealed anti-bias laws protecting gays from discrimination and banned all of the state’s cities from passing any future homosexual-rights laws.

More : query.nytimes.com

These statistics don’t lie: Black and Hispanic home buyers have a harder time getting mortgages.

But why? If lenders discriminate by race, it is up to bank regulators and the Justice Department to enforce anti-bias laws. If, however, minorities are less likely to obtain mortgages mostly because they are more likely to suffer from poverty, the cure — allocating credit by skin color — is arguably worse than the disease. So thoughtful policy makers were delighted when the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston set out in 1990 to answer the question using sophisticated statistical methods.

But four years after the 1992 release of the Boston Fed’s findings — which concluded that racial discrimination was still widespread in the banking industry — otherwise mild-mannered academic experts have gotten into mudslinging matches over the research’s implications. Detractors attack the study as defective in its methodology and tainted by ideological preconceptions. Supporters dismiss their concerns as overblown and wrongheaded.

The publication of the full study in March in the American Economic Review, the flagship journal of the American Economic Association, seems only to have escalated the rhetoric. “I am extremely worried that economics is becoming like other social sciences — not very scientific,” said Anthony Yezer, an economist at George Washington University and a Boston Fed critic.

The study has had an enormous impact on the banking industry. Both the Justice Department and the Massachusetts Attorney General began investigations of lending discrimination in the Boston area shortly after its dissemination. In December 1993, for example, the Justice Department settled a lending-discrimination case against the Shawmut National Corporation, then New England’s third-largest banking institution, after it agreed to take steps to prevent discrimination and pay at least $960,000 to black and Hispanic applicants who were denied loans.

And the Clinton Administration intensified not-so-friendly efforts to persuade lenders to serve minorities. In one celebrated case, the Justice Department forced a suburban Washington bank that had few black mortgage applicants to open an office in a black neighborhood.

The biggest loser in this no-win battle was Alicia Munnell, whose name appeared first among the study’s authors because she was the Boston Fed’s head of research in 1992.

Last year, Ms. Munnell, then a senior Treasury official, was widely expected to be nominated to the Federal Reserve Board by President Clinton. But bankers, angered at the housing-discrimination study, lobbied heavily against her, and Mr. Clinton, his popularity then at a low ebb, last summer decided to duck the fight. Ms. Munnell was named instead to the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers.

Flawed or not, the Boston Fed’s investigation had a noble purpose: leveling the mortgage playing field for minorities. Racial discrimination has been a fixture of the American housing market since Colonial times, and continues in the 1990’s despite state and Federal fair-lending laws. It takes many forms, from “redlining” — the refusal of lending institutions to make loans to residents of deteriorating neighborhoods — to charging minorities higher interest rates and fees.

Newsday recently reported that its examination of almost 100,000 mortgage-loan applications on Long Island showed blacks had been rejected almost three times as often as whites, even when they had the same income. And this week, the Fleet Financial Group of Boston agreed to pay about $4 million to black and Hispanic customers to settle allegations of overcharging them for mortgage loans.

Unequal treatment of minorities isn’t necessarily motived by racism; it can also reflect lesser creditworthiness or other economic disparities. Indeed, while the Boston Fed’s finding that racial discrimination is a significant problem has stiffened regulators’ resolve to police lending practices, skeptics see little in it to justify new efforts to bully banks into lending more to minorities.

More : query.nytimes.com

The combination of a growing work force and $3-per-gallon gasoline resulted in an estimated 110 million boardings onto King County Metro buses in 2007.

Deficit may hinder stimulus efforts

War costs of $9.6 billion a month and a gaping federal deficit limit how the U.S. government can fend off a recession.

More : seattletimes.nwsource.com

This is for a reader who demands to know why I write about gay issues. His conclusion is that I must secretly be gay myself.

Actually, he doesn’t express himself quite that civilly. To the contrary, his e-mails — which, until recently, were arriving at the rate of about one a week — evince a juvenility that would embarrass a reasonably intelligent fifth-grader. The most recent one, for example, carried a salutation reading, “Hi Mrs. Pitts.”

We’re talking about the kind of thing for which delete buttons were invented. So you may wonder why I bring it to your attention, especially since acknowledging a person like this only encourages him. It’s simple, actually: He raises an interesting question that deserves an answer.

If from that you conclude (or fear) you’re about to read a stirring defense of my manly male masculinity, no. The guy is free to believe what he wishes; I really don’t care. And here, let me digress to confess that, though I refer to him using masculine pronouns, I actually don’t know if he’s a he because his notes have been anonymous. Still, I assume it’s a guy because the level of sexual insecurity the e-mails suggest strikes me as — boy, am I going to get in trouble for this — rather guy-specific.

Anyway, to get back to the point, I’m not here to argue sexuality. I just find myself intrigued by the idea that if you’re not gay, you shouldn’t care about gay rights.

The most concise answer I can give is cribbed from what a white kid said 40 or so years ago, as white college students were risking their lives to travel South and register black people to vote. Somebody asked why. He said he acted from an understanding that his freedom was bound up with the freedom of every other man.

I know it sounds cornier than Kellogg’s, but that’s pretty much how I feel.

I know also that some folks are touchy about anything seeming to equate the black civil-rights movement with the gay one. And no, gay people were not kidnapped from Gay Land and sold into slavery, nor lynched by the thousands.

On the other hand, they do know something about housing discrimination, they do know job discrimination, they do know murder for the sin of existence, they do know the denial of civil rights and they do know what it is like to be used as scapegoat and boogeyman by demagogues and political opportunists.

They know enough of what I know that I can’t ignore it. See, I have yet to learn how to segregate my moral concerns. It seems to me if I abhor intolerance, discrimination and hatred when they affect people who look like me, I must also abhor them when they affect people who do not. For that matter, I must abhor them even when they benefit me. Otherwise, what I claim as moral authority is really just self-interest in disguise.

Among the things we seem to have lost in the years since that white kid made his stand is the ability, the imagination, the willingness to put ourselves into the skin of those who are not like us.

I find it telling that Vice President Dick Cheney hews to the hard conservative line on virtually every social issue, except gay marriage. It is, of course, no coincidence that Cheney has a daughter who is a lesbian. Which tells me his position is based not on principle but, rather, on loving his daughter.

It is a fine thing to love your daughter. I would argue, however, that it is also a fine thing and in some ways, a finer thing, to love your neighbor’s daughter, no matter her sexual orientation, religion, race, creed or economic status — and to want her freedom as eagerly as you want your own.

I believe in moral coherence. And Rule No. 1 is, you cannot assert your own humanity, then turn right around and deny someone else’s.

More : seattletimes.nwsource.com

With center Yao Ming out because of an injured left foot, China never had a chance against the powerful United States team.

LeBron James of the Cleveland Cavaliers scored 22 points and Carmelo Anthony of the Denver Nuggets added 18 to lead the Americans to a 119-73 win over China on Monday.

“We are always going to be ready to play. The guys are bringing a lot of energy off the bench,” said James, who thrilled the capacity crowd with several dunks on fast breaks. “We are producing on the court and taking care of business. We just had our stuff.”

It was the second consecutive drubbing of an opponent by the United States, which beat Puerto Rico by 45 points last week.

“I was happy in that we played very hard every second and we played unselfishly, and as long as we do those two things, we will continue to improve,” said U.S. coach Mike Krzyzewski, better known for coaching Duke. “This team is not about individual performance. It’s about collective performance.”

The U.S. team led by 23 points at halftime and by 40 after three quarters.

“We are one of the best teams,” James said.

Meanwhile, China didn’t have its best players.

Besides Houston standout Yao, NBA veteran Wang Zhizhi sat out. Wang has a torn knee ligament.

The U.S. defense repeatedly stole the ball, and China’s players sometimes slipped and fell as they attempted to keep up with their faster opponents.

The Americans, who are preparing for the world-championship tournament that starts Aug. 19 in Japan, play Brazil in Guangzhou today.

Turiaf to play for France

Former Gonzaga standout Ronny Turiaf has been picked for France’s 12-man team at the world championship, according to a FIBA news release.

Turiaf, 23, will be a backup center. He averaged 2.0 points and seven minutes for the Los Angeles Lakers last season. Turiaf had heart surgery last summer.

France coach Claude Bergeaud said the 12th man on the roster will be either 7-footer Johan Petro, 20, of the Sonics or national-team veteran Cyril Julian, 32.

Sterling is sued

LOS ANGELES — The U.S. Department of Justice sued Donald Sterling, Los Angeles Clippers owner and a real-estate mogul, for housing discrimination, claiming he refused to rent apartments to black people and families who have children.

Federal prosecutors contend Sterling, his wife, Rochelle, and their family trust refused to rent to many prospective tenants, treated them poorly and misrepresented the availability of apartments to them in Los Angeles.

The defendants also are accused of refusing to rent to black prospective tenants in Beverly Hills, as well as families with children looking to rent apartments the defendants owned or managed in Los Angeles County.

More : seattletimes.nwsource.com

President Clinton announced today that he had chosen the president of the Wilderness Society, George T. Frampton Jr., to be an Assistant Secretary of the Interior.

If confirmed by the Senate, Mr. Frampton will supervise the National Park Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service.

Mr. Frampton was law clerk for Associate Supreme Court Justice Harry A. Blackmun and was a member of the Watergate special prosecution force. He has been president of the Wilderness Society since 1986.

He is one of nearly two dozen people named today by Mr. Clinton to sub-Cabinet jobs. All are subject to confirmation by the Senate, which could take weeks or months. New Yorker Selected

Harriet S. Rabb, vice dean of Columbia Law School, was selected to be general counsel of the Department of Health and Human Services. She teaches courses in civil rights and is an expert on employment discrimination and housing discrimination.

Mr. Clinton named David T. Ellwood, an expert on welfare, to be Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services for planning and evaluation.

In his 1988 book, “Poor Support: Poverty in the American Family” (Basic Books), Mr. Ellwood said “welfare, by its very nature, creates conflict and frustration and tension because it treats the symptoms of poverty, not its causes.”

President Clinton has endorsed many recommendations made in Mr. Ellwood’s book, including increasing tax credits for poor working families with children and increasing the minimum wage. Both have suggested limiting the duration of welfare.

Mr. Clinton chose two labor union lobbyists for senior jobs in his Administration. He named Jerry Klepner to be Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services for legislation. Mr. Klepner is now director of legislation at the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

And he named Geri Palast to be Assistant Secretary of Labor for congressional relations. She is director of politics and legislation at the Service Employees International Union. More Appointments

More : query.nytimes.com

Four Civil Court seats are being contested in New York City’s Democratic primary on Sept. 15. The winners are almost certain to prevail in November’s general election.

THE BRONX. Countywide: The countywide race for Civil Court pits Wilma Guzman, an experienced trial attorney specializing in negligence cases, against Anthony Chiofalo, a corporate attorney with scant litigation experience.

Mr. Chiofalo, who was rated ”not approved” by the City Bar Association, says he is running to offer voters a choice in the face of his opponent’s cross-endorsement by the Democratic, Republican and Liberal Parties. We share his opposition to the cross-endorsement deals that deprive residents of real elections. But our endorsement goes to the better qualified candidate, Ms. Guzman.

Second District (Mott Haven, Hunts Point, Highbridge, Morris Heights, Woodlawn, University Heights, Fordham, Morrisania, East Tremont, Bedford Park, Belmont, West Pelham Parkway and Riverdale): As a sitting Criminal Court judge presiding over the borough’s new domestic violence court, La Tia Martin has shown she has the talent, temperament and energy to emerge as a leader of the state’s judiciary. We enthusiastically endorse her bid for Civil Court over Philip Werbel, a solo practitioner with a storefront practice. BROOKLYN. Countywide: Alan Drezin boasts decades of experience in private practice and as an arbitrator in the small claims division of Civil Court. But he has circulated misleading literature suggesting he is already a judge, and says he would give the Democratic organization a big say in picking his law clerk should he be elected, raising concerns about his independence.

His opponent, Loren Baily Schiffman, is an able legal services lawyer with expertise in housing discrimination law. She showed poor judgment while in private practice a few years ago by sharing an office with a disbarred attorney. But her overall record suggests she is more likely than her opponent to be a hard-working, independent judge. We endorse Ms. Schiffman.

Fourth District (East Flatbush, East New York, Brownsville and parts of Flatbush, Crown Heights and Bedford-Stuyvesant): Edward Roberts, a solo practitioner and community activist, holds the most promise for the bench by virtue of his legal experience and temperament. We prefer him over Bernadette Bayne, a former Criminal Court judge whose injudicious temperament justly cost her reappointment, and Dolores Waltrous-Joseph, a law clerk for a state Supreme Court justice.

More : query.nytimes.com